Gains or Losses? The Impact of China’s land Tenure Reform on Farmers’ Livelihood Capital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/ijomsr.2025.08(07).07Keywords:
Transfer of Homestead Use Rights (THUR), Land Reform, Rural Livelihood Capital, Government RoleAbstract
To address the challenges of population loss, vacant housing, and the single-source livelihood income in rural China, the government has initiated a reform of the rural homestead system, to curb rural hollowing-out and population aging, and has significant impacts on rural development and farmers’ livelihoods. Based on the Sustainable Livelihood Framework (SLF) and survey data from typical pilots, this study explores the underlying mechanism of the rural homestead system reform and examines how the transfer of homestead use rights (THUR) influences farmers’ livelihood capital. We found that THUR has a significant positive impact on farmers’ livelihood capital. Besides, different transfer modes have distinct impacts on farmers’ livelihood capital. Overall, this study provides a new theoretical and empirical perspective on the relationship between rural land reform and farmers’ livelihood capital, filling the research gap in this field, and offering solutions for other developing countries to improve rural families’ livelihood capital through land reform.
References
UN-HABITAT. (2024). The promise of adequate housing: A human right we must uphold. https://unhabitat.org/news/10-dec-2024/the-promise-of-adequate-housing-a-human-right-we-must-uphold.
Abadie, A., Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11293.
Abdulai, A., V. Owusu, and R. Goetz (2011). Land tenure differences and investment in land improvement measures: Theoretical and empirical analyses, Journal of Development Economics, 96: 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.08.002.
Appelt, J. L., Siengsounthone, L., Phonekeo, S., Essink, D., Verburg, P. H., & van Vliet, J. (2024). Trade‐offs and synergies between dimensions of well‐being among smallholder farmers in Savannakhet province, Lao PDR. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3197.
Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago press.
Brown, P. H., Park, A. (2002). Education and poverty in rural China. Economics of education review, 21(6), 523-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00040-1.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241-258.
Cai, E., Chen, W., Wei, H., Li, J., Wang, H., Guo, Y., & Feng, X. (2020). The coupling characteristics of population and residential land in rural areas of China and its implications for sustainable land use. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 646-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2015.
Cao, Q., Sarker, M., Sun, J. (2019). Model of the influencing factors of the withdrawal from rural homesteads in China: Application of grounded theory method. Land Use Policy, 85, 285–289.DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.013.
Chambers, R., Conway, G., Brighton Institute of Development Studies. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century (Vol. 296, pp. 1-29). Brighton: Institute of development studies.
Chipfupa, U., Tagwi, A., & Wale, E. (2021). Psychological capital and climate change adaptation: Empirical evidence from smallholder farmers in South Africa. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 13(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1061.
Chowdhury, T. A. (2021). Applying and extending the sustainable livelihoods approach: Identifying the livelihood capitals and well-being achievements of indigenous people in Bangladesh. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 23(2), 302-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-021-00163-z.
Cramb, R. A., Colfer, C. J. P., Dressler, W., Laungaramsri, P., Le, Q. T., Mulyoutami, E., ... & Wadley, R. L. (2009). Swidden transformations and rural livelihoods in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology, 37, 323-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9241-6.
Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1998). New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 57, 259-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00099-6.
Department for International Development (DFID). (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Available at: https://www.eldis.org/document/A3276.
Ellis, F. (2000). The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01229.x.
Fang, Y. P., Fan, J., Shen, M. Y., Song, M. Q. (2014). Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China. Ecological indicators, 38, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.007.
Fabusoro, E., Matsumoto, T., Taeb, M. (2008). Land rights regimes in southwest Nigeria: implications for land access and livelihoods security of settled Fulani agropastoralists. Land Degradation and Development, 19(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.816.
Ghazali, S., Zibaei, M., Azadi, H. (2023). Impact of livelihood strategies and capitals on rangeland sustainability and nomads’ poverty: A counterfactual analysis in Southwest Iran. Ecological Economics, 206, 107738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107738.
Gu, H., Ling, Y., Shen, T., & Yang, L. (2020). How does rural homestead influence the hukou transfer intention of rural-urban migrants in China?. Habitat International, 105, 102267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102267.
Guo, S., Lin, L., Liu, S., Wei, Y., Xu, D., Li, Q., & Su, S. (2019). Interactions between sustainable livelihood of rural household and agricultural land transfer in the mountainous and hilly regions of Sichuan, China. Sustainable Development, 27(4), 725-742. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1937.
Huang, L. (2018). From benign unconstitutionality to delegated legislation: Analysis on the ways for legal reform of China rural collective construction land circulation. Habitat international, 74, 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.02.008.
Jackman, R. W., Miller, R. A. (1998). Social capital and politics. Annual review of political science, 1(1), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.47.
Kan, K. (2021). Creating land markets for rural revitalization: Land transfer, property rights and gentrification in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 81, 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.006.
Kong, X., Liu, Y., Jiang, P., Tian, Y., & Zou, Y. (2018). A novel framework for rural homestead land transfer under collective ownership in China. Land Use Policy, 78, 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.046.
Kuang, F. (2019). Influence of livelihood capital on adaptation strategies. Land Use Policy, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104228.
Li, W., Shuai, C., Shuai, Y., Cheng, X., Liu, Y., & Huang, F. (2020). How livelihood assets contribute to sustainable development of smallholder farmers. Journal of International Development, 32(3), 408-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3461.
Li, S., Yang, R., Long, H., Lin, Y., Ge, Y. (2024). Rural spatial restructuring in suburbs under capital intervention: Spatial construction based on nature. Habitat International, 150, 103112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103112.
Liu, R., Jiang, J., Yu, C., Rodenbiker, J., Jiang, Y. (2021). The endowment effect accompanying villagers' withdrawal from rural homesteads: Field evidence from Chengdu, China. Land Use Policy, 101, 105107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105107.
Liu, W., Yin, L., Zeng, Y. (2024). How new rural elites facilitate community-based homestead system reform in rural China: A perspective of village transformation. Habitat International, 149, 103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103096.
Lu, X., Peng, W., Huang, X., Fu, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Homestead management in China from the “separation of two rights” to the “separation of three rights”: Visualization and analysis of hot topics and trends by map** knowledge domains of academic papers in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Land Use Policy, 97, 104670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104670.
Ma, X., Wang, R., Dai, M., & Ou, Y. (2021). The influence of culture on the sustainable livelihoods of households in rural tourism destinations. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(8), 1235-1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1826497.
Missemer, A. (2018). Natural Capital as an Economic Concept, History and Contemporary Issues. Ecological Economics, 143, 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.011.
Moser, C. O. (1998). The asset vulnerability framework: reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development, 26(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10015-8.
Natarajan, N., Newsham, A., Rigg, J., & Suhardiman, D. (2022). A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century. World Development, 155, 105898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898.
Netshipale, A. J., Oosting, S. J., Mashiloane, M. L., Van Reenen, C. G., De Boer, I. J., & Raidimi, E. N. (2020). Agriculture in land reform farms: Impact on livelihoods of beneficiaries in the Waterberg district, South Africa. Land Use Policy, 97, 104710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104710.
Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of economic perspectives, 14(3), 137-158.DOI: 10.1257/jep.14.3.137.
Pandey, R., Jha, S. K., Alatalo, J. M., Archie, K. M., & Gupta, A. K. (2017). Sustainable livelihood framework-based indicators for assessing climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Himalayan communities. Ecological indicators, 79, 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.047.
Ribot, J. C., Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x.
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis (Vol. 72, pp. 1-22). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Sen, A. (1997). From income inequality to economic inequality. Southern Economic Journal, 64(2), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.1997.tb00063.x.
Singh, A., Kumar, S., Goel, U., Johri, A. (2023). Behavioural biases in real estate investment: a literature review and future research agenda. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02366-7.
Tian, G., Lin, T., Li, W., Gao, Y., Xu, T., & Zhu, W. (2025). Spatial-temporal characteristics and transfer modes of rural homestead in China. Habitat International, 155, 103230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103230.
Totin, E., Segnon, A., Roncoli, C., Thompson-Hall, M., Sidibé, A., & Carr, E. R. (2021). Property rights and wrongs: Land reforms for sustainable food production in rural Mali. Land Use Policy, 109, 105610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105610.
Vista, B. M., Nel, E., & Binns, T. (2012). Land, landlords and sustainable livelihoods: The impact of agrarian reform on a coconut hacienda in the Philippines. Land Use Policy, 29(1), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.002.
Wang, L., Ding, X., Hong, M., Xiong, W., & Tan, Y. (2024). Exploring changes and influencing factors of farmers’ welfare in different villages under the background of homestead system reform. Habitat International, 153, 103190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103190.
Wang, Y., & Li, T. (2024). Behavioural selection of farmer households for rural homestead use in China: Self-occupation and transfer. Habitat International, 152, 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103163.
Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Exploring the outflow of population from poor areas and its main influencing factors. Habitat International, 99, 102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102161.
Wu, Z., Dai, X., Li, B., & Hou, Y. (2021). Livelihood consequences of the Grain for Green Programme across regional and household scales: A case study in the Loess Plateau. Land use policy, 111, 105746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105746.
Xu, D., Guo, S., Xie, F., Liu, S., & Cao, S. (2017). The impact of rural laborer migration and household structure on household land use arrangements in mountainous areas of Sichuan Province, China. Habitat International, 70, 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.10.009.
Xu, D., Deng, X., Guo, S., Liu, S. (2019). Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital: An empirical investigation using nationally representative survey data from rural China. Social Indicators Research, 144, 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2037-6.
Yang, L. (2019). The impacts of farmers' livelihood capitals on planting decisions: A case study of Zhagana Agriculture-Forestry-Animal Husbandry Composite System. Land Use Policy, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.030.
Ye, L., Huang, X., Yang, H., Chen, Z., Zhong, T., & **e, Z. (2018). Effects of dual land ownerships and different land lease terms on industrial land use efficiency in Wuxi City, East China. Habitat International, 78, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.04.011.
Yu, Wei., Bencheng, L. I. U., & Jinping, S. O. N. G. (2016). A study on farmers' willingness to quit rural residential lands and its influencing factors. Geographical Research, 35(3), 551-560.
Zhang, Y. (2018). Grabbing land for equitable development? Reengineering land dispossession through securitising land development rights in Chongqing. Antipode, 50(4), 1120-1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12390.
Zhang, Y., Torre, A., & Ehrlich, M. (2023). The impact of Chinese government promoted homestead transfer on labor migration and household's well-being: A study in three rural areas. Journal of Asian Economics, 86, 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2023.101616.
Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects. Land use policy, 91, 104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104330.